Maker-Taker Fees Explained (and How to Design a Fee Schedule)

The maker-taker model is the single most important pricing decision an exchange makes. It's how you reward liquidity, how you compete on cost, and — because trading fees are the core revenue line — how you actually make money. If you're launching a venue, designing this schedule is not an afterthought.

Makers vs. takers

Every trade has two sides, and the fee model treats them differently:

• Makers place resting limit orders that add liquidity to the book. They're charged less — sometimes zero, sometimes a rebate — because they make the market deeper for everyone else.
• Takers place market orders that remove liquidity by hitting resting orders. They pay more, because they consume the depth makers provide.

This asymmetry is deliberate: it pays traders to post liquidity, which tightens spreads and improves the experience for everyone. (Where that liquidity actually comes from on day one is its own challenge — see How a New Exchange Gets Liquidity.)

What real fee levels look like

Fees vary by venue, product, and volume tier. Binance is a useful reference point:

Two patterns stand out: derivatives fees are lower per-trade than spot (they compete on razor-thin margins because volume is enormous), and both fall further at higher VIP tiers (Binance spot and futures schedules, as of 2026). Remember that on derivatives the fee applies to leveraged notional, so a low headline rate still generates substantial revenue.

How the fee schedule drives revenue

Small percentages, big volumes. Use the estimator to see how a fee schedule translates into revenue at different scales:

Designing your own schedule

A few principles for operators:

• Reward makers. Low or negative maker fees attract the market makers who give you depth. It's an investment in liquidity, not lost revenue.
• Use volume tiers. Progressive discounts keep your highest-volume traders (and market makers) loyal.
• Match the market. Your fees are benchmarked against whoever your traders would otherwise use. The ranking bar is set by competitors, not by theory.
• Mind the notional. On leveraged products, model revenue on notional, not margin.

Fee levels reflect the cited schedules as of 2026 and change by tier and over time.